Dear professor, I had tried the 100 (fibres in the radial direction), 010 (fibres in the circumferential direction) and the 110 (at an angle) configurations. When I use 100, I got the cylindrical results that I had attached earlier. The 010 configuration gave me the non-cylindrical displacement. You had suggested that even for 010, it should provide us with a cylindrical displacement. I had probably attached the input file after having tried the 110 configuration.
With regards to the a0 values, I am using the same system (110 ~ a0 = 0.7071 0.7071 0).
Did you get a cylindrical result when you used the 010 fibre direction?