Author Topic: maximum SNODE  (Read 7917 times)

maxlox

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
maximum SNODE
« on: December 24, 2013, 04:10:39 AM »
Hi all,
the attached file stop run feappv (ver. 3.1 rev. f) with the errors:
 
Quote
*ERROR* SIDE   66 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry    2

 *ERROR* SIDE   66 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry    3

 *ERROR* SIDE   67 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry    3

 *ERROR* SIDE   67 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry   11

 *ERROR* SIDE   68 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry    3

 *ERROR* SIDE   68 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   28) at entry   11
in feap (ver. 7.5) the program run normal.
Someone can tell me what's about ?

p.s. in feappv "plot,snod" don't show anything, but in manul is present the option to view "snod" in plot

Thanks
maxlox
« Last Edit: December 24, 2013, 04:13:16 AM by maxlox »
** maxlox **

FEAP_Admin

  • Administrator
  • FEAP Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 993
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2013, 01:59:28 PM »
You may have a corrupt executable.  Your problem ran fine for me with v3. 
attached is the top part of the output file to help you debug.
plot,snode is only available in the full version of FEAP.

maxlox

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2013, 02:45:38 AM »
Hi and Merry Christmas Feap_Admin,
You may have a corrupt executable.  Your problem ran fine for me with v3. 
attached is the top part of the output file to help you debug.
I've re-download feappv from http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap/feappv/ for my systems (windows 7 64bit, win xp 32bit):
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap/feappv/feappv31_win_64.exe
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap/feappv/feappv31_win_32.exe
problem remain in both cases  :'(
with my full ver no problem !

plot,snode is only available in the full version of FEAP.
in the feappv manual (pag. 158) the comman is possible ... and should be a good control for mesh - however ...
** maxlox **

Prof. R.L. Taylor

  • Administrator
  • FEAP Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2013, 02:37:35 PM »
Sorry. manual is incorrect, you cannot plot them -- check the pplotf.f file for available plot options.

Have you compiled the program on your computer.  Compiled versions may not be compatible with your system.

Z.M.

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2016, 11:17:38 AM »
Dear Prof. Taylor and FEAPpv users,

is there a solution for the problem? I have the same error in the output file.

Is it possible that FEAPpv is limited for snodes?
Version: FEAPpv 3.1 Revision F, for 64-bit, Windows

Many thanks in advance for your help.

ERROR:

*ERROR* SIDE   66 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   38) at entry    2

 *ERROR* SIDE   66 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   38) at entry    3

 *ERROR* SIDE   67 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   38) at entry    3

 *ERROR* SIDE   67 has value greater than maximum SNODE (   38) at entry   11

Prof. R.L. Taylor

  • Administrator
  • FEAP Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2016, 05:24:29 AM »
The error message comes from the blend or side command and tells you that it generated a node larger than the number of SNODes generated.

So one of the routines is not working correctly.

Prof. R.L. Taylor

  • Administrator
  • FEAP Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2016, 06:11:40 AM »
The error is found in subroutine 'mshcksn".  You could print the "is" array to see what is stored in it and try to track down why your machine is making an error.  The array does have fixed dimension of is(16,...) but that does not seem to be a problem for the data given.

All my programs process the data correctly.  Program compiled using intel compiler on a mac, not a windows machine.

Z.M.

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: maximum SNODE
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2016, 02:16:20 PM »
Dear Prof. R.L. Taylor,

Thanks for your input, i will try to solve the problem.